Blood On Her Hands! Hacked Hillary Emails Reveal She Knowingly Delayed Benghazi Rescue – Exclusive
“Hillary Clinton refused to send help as the terrifying Benghazi attacks unfolded, according to messages allegedly hacked from her email server and distributed by Russian operatives.
RadarOnline has obtained a report about the allegedly hacked messages that was created by Italy’s foreign intelligence agency, or the Agenzia Informazioni e Sicurezza Esterna, after a meeting with their Russian counterparts on October 22. (These files were written in Italian, and then translated by a respected New York City professor of the language.)
One section of the report deals with September 2012 — the same month as the attack that killed U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens, and three others. In an alleged message from Clinton to top aide Huma Abedin, the secretary made it clear she wasn’t going to rush to take action.
““Avoid that they appeal to the AUMF, lets give a political weight to the wait, take time,” the message reads. (The acronym AUMF most likely refers to an “authorization for the use of military force.”)
The text continues, “What has happened has happened, at Sigonella they are standing still, they have to remain firm.”
Sigonella almost certainly refers to Naval Air Station Sigonella, located in the Italian island region of Sicily. According to reports, a US Air Force source once claimed that attack jets were being armed and fueled at Aviano Air Force Base in northern Italy on Sept. 11, 2012, or the night of the Benghazi attacks. The source has said the jets could have refueled at Sigonella, which is located some 400 miles from Benghazi, and helped stave off the slaughter.
But according to the message, Clinton insisted, “the more hours go by the better it is,” claiming, “it will seem that he is not able to take a decision about an international scenario.” Was she trying to make President Barack Obama look bad?
– What is troubling, is that fact that Huma Abeding was auto forwarding or achiving all her emails with Hillary to an insecure Yahoo account. If our adversaries had access to that content, as Huma emailed to Hillary in real-time, they would have had unbelievable real-time intelligence. /CJ
Hillary Reveals USA nuclear response time to Global audience
– Hillary may have breached national security by giving away nuclear response information during the final and third debate.
Was it a mistake? Was it induced due to medication, and it if was, does that excuse it? / CJ
PENTAGON OFFICIALS FURIOUS AFTER CLINTON ANNOUNCES US RESPONSE TIME FOR NUCLEAR LAUNCH DURING DEBATE
– Liberty News
“Following Wednesday’s presidential debate Pentagon officials found themselves completely dumbfounded as to why former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would feel it appropriate to announce U.S. Special Access Program intel on national television.
According to sources within the Department of Defense speaking under anonymity, Clinton likely violated at least two Dept. of Defense SAP protocols during the debate by announcing on live televisionthe United States Government’s response time for a nuclear launch.
To the dismay of intelligence officials, the fact that this top secret information is now publicly known not only proves that Clinton is “unfit to be commander-in-chief,” but it also poses a direct threat to national security.
One high ranking intelligence official explained that any time frame calculated pertaining to a US nuclear launch “would have merely been an educated hypothesis, absent leaked documents and there have been no such breaches” prior to Clinton’s admission Wednesday.
According to Pentagon sources, the information Clinton disseminated publicly is Top Secret intelligence governed under the U.S. Special Access Program (SAP) which dictates safeguards and protocols for accessing and discussing highly classified and Top Secret intelligence. The specific details of the country’s nuclear response time discussed by Clinton, sources said, are only known by a handful of individuals outside top military brass…
“Targeting options by ICBM (intercontinental ballistic missiles), air or sea, launch order, launch procedures and response are some of the most secretly guarded tenets of national security and nuclear war policy,” a Pentagon source said. “It’s truly incredible that (nuclear) response time as part of an ERO (Emergency Response Option) is now out there in the public domain to our adversaries.”
U.S. Defense sources said according to developed U.S. counterintelligence, military officials in China, North Korea, Syria, Russia, Iran and even actors like ISIS had no previous definitive intelligence to determine the U.S. nuclear response time, especially during an ERO, prior to Clinton’s admission Wednesday night. Sources reluctantly acknowledged her calculations were accurate.”
Hillary Casually Gives Away Nuclear Secrets At Presidential Debate
– the Federalist Papers
“For someone who touts herself as the most prepared candidate for president in American history, Hillary Clinton sure does a lot of dumb things.
During the third and final presidential debate Wednesday night, there was a moment when Hillary began talking about nuclear weapons.
While you watch this, keep in mind that Hillary and the Leftists are suggesting that Donald Trump is too unstable – or dumb, or whatever – to be trusted with the nuclear codes:
“Here’s the deal,” Hillary tells Chris Wallace and the entire planet watching live, culled from The Daily Wire, “The bottom line on nuclear weapons is that when the president gives the order it must be followed. There’s about four minutes between the order being given and the people responsible for launching nuclear weapons to do so.
So effectively, while calling out Trump for being “casual” about the use of nuclear weapons, Hillary Clinton literally told the entire world what our response time is to prepare for nuclear attack.
As IJR reports: “This four-minute figure may be “out there,” but it’s certainly alarming how casually Hillary Clinton talks about sensitive matters of national security.
“Almost as sloppy as hosting a private server without government security and transmitting classified and sensitive material via email.”
‘WTF’ Moment at 3rd Presidential Debate: Hillary Gives Away Time it Takes for US Nuclear Response
Why is Hillary talking about the time it takes the U.S. to launch a nuclear strike against its enemies?
“It was a WTF (What the Frick) moment during the 3rd Presidential debate: That time Hillary Clinton talked about the amount of time it takes the U.S. to launch a nuclear strike against its enemies:
Sure, we get that you don’t like The Donald, and Democrats and some moderates are petrified that Trump will get his hands on the nuclear football, but you’re talking about the time it takes the US to launch a nuclear strike against its enemies.
The “four-minute warning” has a history going back to the Cold War and describes the approximate time it took for the Soviet Union (they were communists, and were bad) to launch nuclear weapons at Great Britain. That time is around what it would take Putin to launch nukes: two to four minutes. But the U.S. launch response time?”
HILLARY COMMITS ANOTHER CRIME – LEAKS NUCLEAR SECRETS DURING DEBATE
“Hillary Clinton has a history of skirting the law.
Laws are for the little people.
She’s been accused during sworn testimony of disrespecting security agents and putting them in danger.
She abandonded her “friend” Ambassador Chris Stevens and left him to the Islamists who slaughtered him in Benghazi.
Tonight during the final presidential debate Hillary Clinton leaked more national security secrets.
Hillary said it took four minutes between the nuclear order and nukes flying.”
‘How to Commit Voter Fraud on a Massive Scale’: Part II of Project Veritas Investigation into Clinton Network
“The second video in James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas investigation of the 2016 election reveals what O’Keefe describes as “Democratic Party operatives tell[ing] us how to successfully commit voter fraud on a massive scale.”
In the video, Foval is heard saying, “We manipulated the vote with money and action, not with laws.”
He then explains:
It’s a pretty easy thing for Republicans to say, ‘Well, they’re bussing people in!’ Well, you know what? We’ve been bussing people in to deal with you fuckin’ assholes for fifty years, and we’re not going to stop now. We’re just going to find a different way to do it. So, I mean I grew up with that idea. They used to bus people out to Iowa. If they needed people there we’d bus people out to Iowa.
Foval also discusses the problem of being caught, stating, “The question is, whether when you get caught by a reporter, does that matter? Because does it turn into an investigation or not? In this case, this state, the answer is no, because they don’t have any power to do anything.”
Foval suggests that the voter fraud scheme could potentially be implemented “on a much bigger scale. You implement a massive change in state legislatures and in Congress. So you aim higher for your goals, and you implement it across every Republican-held state.”
“I have never seen in my lifetime or in modern political history any presidential candidate trying to discredit the elections and the election process before votes have even taken place,” he said. “It’s unprecedented. It happens to be based on no facts.”
Obama pointed out that experts on both sides of the aisle agree that “instances of significant voter fraud” have never been found. ”
WikiLeaks: Clinton Camp Believed President Obama Committed Voter Fraud in 2008
– Daily Caller
“Two attorneys with close ties to the Clinton family believe then-Sen. Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign “flooded” the caucuses with “ineligible voters,” according to leaked emails.
Emails hacked from Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager John Podesta cites two attorneys and “old friends of the Clintons,” James Lyons and Michael Driver, tasked with “caucus protection, election protection and to raise hard $” for the 2016 Colorado caucus.
Apparently, Lyons and Driver didn’t want a repeat of 2008 when, they believe, the Obama campaign “flooded the caucuses with ineligible voters,” according to the email chain released by WikiLeaks. It’s unclear if they are only talking about the Colorado caucus or those in other states.
“High importance,” Podesta wrote to campaign staffers in a May 2015 email.
“I met with Jim and Mike in Denver,” Podesta wrote. “They are both old friends of the Clintons and have lots of experience. Mike hosted our Boulder Road Show event. They are reliving the 08 caucuses where they believe the Obama forces flooded the caucuses with ineligible voters. They want to organize lawyers for caucus protection, election protection and to raise hard $. They are not just Colorado focused and have good contacts in the region.”
Hillary Clinton Jokes to Goldman Sachs: We’re Going to Give China a ‘Red State’
“Hillary Clinton told Goldman Sachs that she would give the Chinese a “red state” if she was ever in a position where she had to swap territory back and forth with the Chinese.
Clinton made the remarks in a private paid speech to Goldman Sachs on October 29, 2013, according to speech transcripts released as part of Wikileaks’ John Podesta email dump. Clinton first talks about China taking land in the Pacific that the United States could theoretically take, which would re-name the Pacific Ocean the “American Sea”:
Goldman Sachs chairman Lloyd Blankfein then joked about giving the Chinese New Jersey, and Clinton said that we would give the Chinese a red state, according to the transcripts:
MR. BLANKFEIN: These are more technical conversations than I thought they would be. (Laughter.)
SECRETARY CLINTON: Yes, yes. And then he says tome, well, you know, we’ll claim Hawaii. And I said, yeah, but we have proof we bought it. Do you have proof you brought any of these places you’re claiming? So we got into the nitty-gritty of—
MR. BLANKFEIN: But they have to take New Jersey. (Laughter.)
SECRETARY CLINTON: No, no, no. We’re going to give them a red state.”