– A lot to unpack, but a legal case has a lot of facts to follow. It’s not simple, criminals make it complicated on purpose. The president had everyone reason to look into corruption, extortion and bribery in a foreign country. Rudy has the docs and the facts.
Giuliani’s critics argue Rudy crossed a few lines in gathering evidence, seriously? Giuliani is a former Federal Prosecutor from New York City, seriously you think he would cross legal red lines?
IG Report Reveals Steele Funneled Claims Through John McCain After FBI Dropped Him || Breitbart
“Late Senator John McCain provided disgraced former FBI chief James Comey with five separate reports from Christopher Steele that the FBI didn’t previously possess related to unsubstantiated allegations of collusion between Russia and President Trump’s 2016 campaign, the Justice Department’s recent Inspector General report revealed.
There have long been questions about why it was necessary for McCain to pass Steele’s anti-Trump dossier to Comey on December 9, 2016, several weeks after the November 2016 presidential election. By then, Steele had already met numerous times with FBI agents to provide them with his controversial reports. Steele, however, was terminated as an FBI source in the fall of 2016 because he spoke to the news media.
The IG report discloses that McCain gave five new Steele reports to Comey that the FBI did not previously possess, showing that McCain served as a conduit for Steele’s information to reach the FBI even after the British ex-spy was formally cut off as an FBI source.”
…..See more here: Breitbart
[VIDEO] Stammering, Blabbering, Stuttering Pelosi Tries to Explain the Impeachment Delay || PJ Media
Sen. Hawley Drops a Bomb on Horowitz: ‘The Collusion Here Was Between the DNC and the FBI’ || PJMedia
…..see more at PJ Media
Rep. Gaetz Leaves Dem Witnesses Dumbfounded | Youtube
Rep. Matt Gaetz asks the Inquiry witnesses today if ANY of them had actual evidence Trump committed a crime. He’s met with complete silence.
Jonathan Turley Makes Dispassionate Case Against Impeachment || Mediate
“Professor Jonathan Turley, one of the legal experts testifying in today’s House Judiciary Committee, argued that right now there’s not a clear case for impeachment.
Recalling his prior testimony during the Clinton impeachment saga, Turley said, “I’m not a supporter of President Trump. I voted against him. My personal views of President Trump are as irrelevant to my impeachment testimony as they should be to your impeachment vote. President Trump will not be our last president, and what we leave in the wake of this scandal will shape our democracy for generations to come.”
“I am concerned about lowering impeachment standards to fit a paucity of evidence and abundance of anger,” he argued. “I believe this not only fails to satisfy the standard of past impeachments but would create a dangerous precedent for future impeachments.”
Turley said he does not see “compelling evidence of the commission of a crime,” and added, “Second is the abbreviated period of this investigation, which is problematic and puzzling. This is a facially incomplete and inadequate record in order to impeach a president.”
…See more at: Mediaite